A Multimodal Intervention to Reduce C. difficile Infections and Stool Testing.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of multiplex gastrointestinal panels at our institution resulted in increased Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) detection and stool test utilization. We aimed to reduce hospital-onset C. difficile infections (HO-CDIs), C. difficile detection, and overall stool testing by 20% within 1 year. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement project from 2018 to 2020 at a large children's hospital. Interventions included development of a C. difficile testing and treatment clinical care pathway, new options for gastrointestinal panel testing with or without C. difficile (results were suppressed if not ordered), clinical decision support tool to restrict testing, and targeted prevention efforts. Outcomes included the rate of HO-CDI (primary), C. difficile detection, and overall stool testing. All measures were evaluated monthly among hospitalized children per 10 000 patient-days (PDs) using statistical process-control charts. For balancing measures, we tracked suppressed C. difficile results that were released during real-time monitoring because of concern for true infection and C. difficile-related adverse events. RESULTS: HO-CDI decreased by 55%, from 11 to 5 per 10 000 PDs. C. difficile detection decreased by 44%, from 18 to 10 per 10 000 PDs, and overall test utilization decreased by 29%, from 99 to 70 per 10 000 PDs. The decrease in stool tests resulted in annual savings of $55 649. Only 2.3% of initially suppressed positive C. difficile results were released, and no patients had adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic stewardship strategies, coupled with an evidence-based clinical care pathway, can be used to decrease C. difficile and improve overall test utilization.

Experiences with COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing: A qualitative analysis.

Case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) is a critical part of the public health response to COVID-19. Individuals' experiences with CI/CT for COVID-19 varied based on geographic location, changes in knowledge and guidelines, access to testing and vaccination, as well as demographic characteristics including age, race, ethnicity, income, and political ideology. In this paper, we explore the experiences and behaviors of adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, or who were exposed to a person with COVID-19, to understand their knowledge, motivations, and facilitators and barriers to their actions. We conducted focus groups and one-on-one interviews with 94 cases and 90 contacts from across the United States. We found that participants were concerned about infecting or exposing others, which motivated them to isolate or quarantine, notify contacts, and get tested. Although most cases and contacts were not contacted by CI/CT professionals, those who were reported a positive experience and received helpful information. Many cases and contacts reported seeking information from family, friends, health care providers, as well as television news and Internet sources. Although participants reported similar perspectives and experiences across demographic characteristics, some highlighted inequities in receiving COVID-19 information and resources.

Pediatric mediastinal mass algorithm: A quality improvement initiative to reduce time from presentation to biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal masses in children may present with compression of the great vessels and airway. An interdisciplinary plan for rapid diagnosis, acute management, and treatment prevents devastating outcomes and optimizes care. Emergency pretreatment with steroids or radiation is more likely to be administered when care is variable, which may delay and complicate diagnosis and treatment. Strategies to standardize care and expedite diagnosis may improve acute patient safety and long-term outcomes. AIMS: The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease time from presentation to diagnostic biopsy for children with an anterior mediastinal mass by 50% over 3 years within a tertiary healthcare system. METHODS: This quality improvement project involved a single center with data collected and analyzed retrospectively and prospectively for 71 patients presenting with anterior mediastinal mass between February 2008 and January 2018. The Model for Improvement was utilized for project design and development of a driver diagram and smart aim. An algorithm was implemented to facilitate communication between teams and standardize initial care of patients with mediastinal masses. The algorithm underwent multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Data were collected before and after algorithm implementation and between each PDSA cycle. The primary outcome measure included time from presentation to biopsy, which was monitored with a statistical process control chart. Several process measures were evaluated with Student's t-tests including administration of emergency pretreatment. RESULTS: Nineteen patients preintervention and 52 patients postintervention were included in the analysis. Time from presentation to biopsy significantly decreased from 48 h at baseline to 24 h postimplementation. Although not statistically significant, emergency pretreatment decreased from a baseline of 26.3% to 6.7% postimplementation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a diagnostic and management algorithm coordinating care among multidisciplinary teams significantly reduced time to biopsy for children presenting with mediastinal mass and may result in decreased use of emergent pretreatment.

A Quality Initiative to Decrease Time to Antibiotics in Children with Sickle Cell Disease and Fever.

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at increased risk for sepsis secondary to functional asplenia. Timely administration of antibiotics, within 60 minutes of triage, is a national indicator of quality SCD care in the United States. However, there are no reports demonstrating the feasibility of doing so in the outpatient hematology-oncology clinic setting. LOCAL PROBLEM: At baseline, in our pediatric hematology-oncology outpatient center, just 10% of children with SCD and fever received timely antibiotics. METHODS: We implemented a process improvement initiative for children with SCD and fever with the aim of ≥90% receiving timely antibiotics. We enacted interventions focused on general clinic processes from check-in to antibiotics and population-specific interventions, including an intravenous access protocol, notification/communication among staff members, and design of an electronic order set. RESULTS: The percentage of children receiving timely antibiotics improved from 10% to 77% with successful maintenance following the interventions. Residual delays are due to nonexpeditious order placement and difficult intravenous access. CONCLUSION: Improving the timely administration of antibiotics in the outpatient hematology-oncology clinic setting for children with SCD and fever is possible. Achieving at least 90% timely antibiotics for children with SCD and fever in the outpatient clinic setting will require ongoing efforts at expeditious order placement and intravenous access.

External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews-which identify, assess, and summarize existing research-are usually designed to determine whether research shows that an intervention has evidence of effectiveness, rather than whether an intervention will work under different circumstances. The reviews typically focus on the internal validity of the research and do not consistently incorporate information on external validity into their conclusions. OBJECTIVES: In this article, we focus on how systematic reviews address external validity. METHODS: We conducted a brief scan of 19 systematic reviews and a more in-depth examination of information presented in a systematic review of home visiting research. RESULTS: We found that many reviews do not provide information on generalizability, such as statistical representativeness, but focus on factors likely to increase heterogeneity (e.g., numbers of studies or settings) and report on context. The latter may help users decide whether the research characteristics-such as sample demographics or settings-are similar to their own. However, we found that differences in reporting, such as which variables are included and how they are measured, make it difficult to summarize across studies or make basic determinations of sample characteristics, such as whether the majority of a sample was unemployed or married. CONCLUSION: Evaluation research and systematic reviews would benefit from reporting guidelines for external validity to ensure that key information is reported across studies.

Exploring the Meanings that Dietitians Associate with their Role of Mother and Dietitian and How They Translate into Child-feeding Practices.

PURPOSE: To explore the meanings that dietitians associate with their role of mother and dietitian and how they translate into child-feeding practices. METHODS: The ideological case-study approach of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, a qualitative research design, was utilized. A convenience sample of 3 dietitians was recruited from the faculty of a university nutrition department. Dietitians participated in semi-structured interviews that were voice-recorded and transcribed. Data were thematically organized and interpreted using the theory of Symbolic Interactionism. RESULTS: Five themes were developed: the evolution of food-related practices, tensions between the role of dietitian and mother, mealtime interaction, integration of dietetic values in child-feeding practices, and the individuality of the mother. Dietitian mothers used various parenting styles when interacting with their children. Their beliefs about best practice in child-feeding correspond with the recommendations of their dietetic profession. Their perception of what it meant to be a good mother was influenced by their identity as a dietitian. RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE: Dietitian mothers need to be aware of the influence of professional discourse; professional thoughts can influence personal thoughts and actions related to child-feeding practices. Further exploration of the topic including maternal and child-feeding practices from the child's perspective is warranted.

Pediatric patients who receive antibiotics for fever and neutropenia in less than 60 min have decreased intensive care needs.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic delivery to patients with fever and neutropenia (F&N) in <60 min is an increasingly important quality measure for oncology centers, but several published reports indicate that a time to antibiotic delivery (TTA) of <60 min is quite difficult to achieve. Here we report a quality improvement (QI) effort that sought to decrease TTA and assess associated clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with cancer and F&N. PROCEDURE: We used Lean-Methodology and a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to direct QI efforts and prospectively tracked TTA measures and associated clinical outcomes (length of stay, duration of fever, use of imaging studies to search for occult infection, bacteremia, intensive care unit (ICU) consultation or admission, and mortality). We then performed statistical analysis to determine the impact of our QI interventions on total TTA, sub-process times, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Our QI interventions significantly improved TTA such that we are now able to deliver antibiotics in <60 min nearly 100% of the time. All TTA sub-process times also improved. Moreover, achieving TTA <60 min significantly reduced the need for ICU consultation or admission (P = 0.003) in this population. CONCLUSION: Here we describe our QI effort along with a detailed assessment of several associated clinical outcomes. These data indicate that decreasing TTA to <60 min is achievable and associated with improved outcomes in pediatric patients with cancer and F&N.

Pregnancy and birth outcome improvements for American Indians in the Healthy Start project of the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, 1998-2008.

American Indians living in Michigan experience disproportionately high rates of infant mortality. This 11-year (1998-2008) cohort study evaluated impacts of a Healthy Start (HS) program administered by the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan (ITCM) on perinatal outcomes. Women who enrolled in ITCM's HS program ("exposed") were compared with non-enrolled ("unexposed") for four outcomes: low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age, preterm birth, and inadequate prenatal care. To classify exposed and unexposed women and their children, Michigan vital records data were linked with HS enrollment records to identify participants and non-participants among all American Indian births. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for the four outcomes of interest. Analyses were stratified for high and low access to care based on Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designation for a woman's county of residence. Of 4,149 American Indian births during the period, 872 were to women who enrolled prenatally in HS. Although unstratified analysis showed no differences between HS participants and non-participants, stratified analyses demonstrated that participants from MUA counties had decreased odds of LBW and inadequate prenatal care. Results suggest that in MUA counties where participants and non-participants are at similar risk for poor outcomes, HS may be reducing barriers and improving outcomes. In non-MUA counties participants had similar outcomes as non-participants. These results may reflect a wider disparity in risk factors between the two groups in non-MUA counties. The complex interplay among need, access, and benefit complicates analyses and suggests the importance of more in-depth and focused studies.